中端主流 CPU 天梯榜首页

装机最纠结的就是 2 万~6 万分这个段位:桌面、笔记本、服务器处理器全混在一起,价格从几百到上万。这期把这个分段的 834 款处理器按 PassMark 综合分排成完整天梯(快照 2026-08-19),往下翻全程长图。

口径:PassMark CPUMark 综合分(多线程满载),条长=分数、以榜首为满条。注意桌面/移动/服务器混排——同分下移动平台功耗低得多,别只看分。

段位头部(5.9 万+)

#处理器综合分
1Intel Core i9-14900KS59,989
2Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus59,398
3Intel Xeon w7-354559,344
4AMD EPYC 7473X59,280
5AMD EPYC 764259,199

i9-14900KS 以 24 分的微弱优势守住 6 万分门槛——这也是消费级桌面在榜单里的最高位置,再往上就全是 HEDT 和服务器的天下了。

完整天梯(834 款 · CPUMark 2 万~6 万)

中端主流 CPU 天梯 1/17
1/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 2/17
2/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 3/17
3/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 4/17
4/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 5/17
5/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 6/17
6/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 7/17
7/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 8/17
8/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 9/17
9/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 10/17
10/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 11/17
11/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 12/17
12/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 13/17
13/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 14/17
14/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 15/17
15/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 16/17
16/17
中端主流 CPU 天梯 17/17
17/17

这个分段怎么选

  • 纯打游戏:这个榜单是多核分,游戏更看单线程和缓存——9800X3D / 7800X3D 综合分不高但游戏强,别被榜带偏
  • 生产力多开:榜单就是你的购买力排序,同价位选分高的,2.5 万和 5 万的渲染时间大约差一倍
  • 捡漏二手:榜单后半段的 EPYC / Xeon 老U性价比爆炸,但注意主板平台和功耗成本,捡漏前先算总账
  • 笔记本:HX 系列在这个榜的位置普遍虚高(功耗释放差异大),买机器看实测功耗再对号入座

想精确对比两款、或按 TDP/平台筛选,直接用 CPU 跑分查询工具;更高端的 6 万分以上看这篇旗舰天梯

免责声明:数据来自 PassMark 公开榜单(2026-08-19 快照),跑分为统计样本平均值,仅供参考。

The segment everyone actually buys in: 20K–60K CPUMark, where desktop, laptop and server CPUs all mix. 834 processors ranked by PassMark multi-core score (snapshot 2026-08-19), full charts below.

Method: PassMark CPUMark. Note desktop/laptop/server are mixed — equal scores favor mobile parts on power draw, so don't read score alone.

Top of the segment (59K+)

#CPUCPUMark
1Intel Core i9-14900KS59,989
2Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus59,398
3Intel Xeon w7-354559,344
4AMD EPYC 7473X59,280
5AMD EPYC 764259,199

The i9-14900KS holds the 60K gate by just 24 points — the highest a consumer desktop reaches before HEDT/server territory takes over.

Full ladder (834 CPUs, 20K–60K)

Midrange CPU ladder 1/17
1/17
Midrange CPU ladder 2/17
2/17
Midrange CPU ladder 3/17
3/17
Midrange CPU ladder 4/17
4/17
Midrange CPU ladder 5/17
5/17
Midrange CPU ladder 6/17
6/17
Midrange CPU ladder 7/17
7/17
Midrange CPU ladder 8/17
8/17
Midrange CPU ladder 9/17
9/17
Midrange CPU ladder 10/17
10/17
Midrange CPU ladder 11/17
11/17
Midrange CPU ladder 12/17
12/17
Midrange CPU ladder 13/17
13/17
Midrange CPU ladder 14/17
14/17
Midrange CPU ladder 15/17
15/17
Midrange CPU ladder 16/17
16/17
Midrange CPU ladder 17/17
17/17

Buying notes

  • Gaming: this board ranks multi-core; games lean on single-thread and cache — X3D parts punch above their position
  • Productivity: the ladder is your price-performance map; 25K vs 50K roughly halves render times
  • Used hunting: older EPYC/Xeon deep in the board are incredible value — but budget the platform and power costs too
  • Laptops: HX parts rank high here but real performance depends on the chassis power limit — check reviews

Precise head-to-heads and TDP/platform filters live in the Benchmark Search tool; the 60K+ segment is in the flagship ladder.

Disclaimer: data from public PassMark rankings (2026-08-19 snapshot); averages, reference only.
返回文章列表