旗舰 CPU 天梯榜首页(含榜首与横幅)

这期把 CPUMark≥6 万的旗舰处理器整理成了一份天梯,一共 179 款,按 PassMark 综合分排。数据快照 2026-08-19,往下翻全程长图;想对比具体两款,文末有在线工具。

口径:PassMark CPUMark 综合分(多线程满载),条长=分数、同榜以第一名为满条;名称含俗称拼接。

前三

#处理器综合分
1AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX171,138
2AMD EPYC 9755166,328
3AMD EPYC Embedded 9755164,010

榜单前六清一色 AMD:线程撕裂者坐头把交椅,EPYC 系列包揽其余——HEDT 与服务器平台在这个分段没有对手。

完整天梯(179 款 · CPUMark≥6 万)

旗舰 CPU 天梯 1/4
1/4
旗舰 CPU 天梯 2/4
2/4
旗舰 CPU 天梯 3/4
3/4
旗舰 CPU 天梯 4/4
4/4

怎么用这份天梯

  • 6 万分是什么概念:比主流游戏神 U(如 9800X3D 的 3.9 万左右)高出一截,这个分段基本都是 24 核以上的生产力平台
  • 买这个段位的看三点:核心数、内存通道(EPYC 12 通道)、以及平台整机预算——CPU 本体往往不是大头
  • 同分选新不选旧:分数接近时优先新架构(单核、能效、指令集都更好)

想查任意两款的具体差距、或者找"性能相近"的替代型号,用 CPU 跑分查询工具,6715 款全收录。看中端主流段位(2 万~6 万)的兄弟看这篇中端主流天梯

免责声明:数据来自 PassMark 公开榜单(2026-08-19 快照),跑分为统计样本平均值,仅供参考,实际性能受平台配置与散热影响。

A complete ladder of all 179 CPUs with CPUMark ≥ 60,000, ranked by PassMark multi-core score (snapshot: 2026-08-19). Full-length charts below; use the online tool to compare any two.

Method: PassMark CPUMark (full-load multi-threaded). Bar length = score, normalized to #1.

Podium

#CPUCPUMark
1AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX171,138
2AMD EPYC 9755166,328
3AMD EPYC Embedded 9755164,010

AMD owns the entire top six — Threadripper on top, EPYC filling the rest. HEDT and server platforms have no rivals here.

Full ladder (179 CPUs)

Flagship CPU ladder 1/4
1/4
Flagship CPU ladder 2/4
2/4
Flagship CPU ladder 3/4
3/4
Flagship CPU ladder 4/4
4/4

How to read it

  • 60K+ means 24+ core productivity platforms — well above gaming parts like the 9800X3D (~39K)
  • At this level, weigh core count, memory channels (EPYC: 12) and whole-platform budget — the CPU is rarely the biggest cost
  • At equal scores, prefer newer architectures (better single-core, efficiency and ISA support)

Compare any two CPUs or find similar-performance alternatives in the free Benchmark Search tool. Mainstream segment (20K–60K) covered in the midrange ladder.

Disclaimer: data from public PassMark rankings (2026-08-19 snapshot); averages across submitted samples, reference only.
返回文章列表